This article is from Epoch Times about Dr. Zheng Zhi who now lives in Canada. I typically will post excerpts from articles I read but this needs to be read in its entirety.

“What Dr. Zheng shared with the public is gruesome beyond words, and there is no explanation for why the international medical community is not acting on China’s horrific organ harvesting.

Where is the WMA [World Medical Association]?

Where is the WHO [World Health Organization]?”


For more than a decade, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been systematically killing innocent people on a large scale, and extracting their vital organs to fuel a multi-billion dollar organ transplant industry. A vast majority of the victims are Falun Gong practitioners, who have been detained by the CCP simply because of their faith.

Use the link above to access the video if you are having a problem.

But the pain was far from over. On the one hand, the entire experience was too horrible to even think about, let alone talk about. I had seen the brutal murder of a fellow human being first-hand, and my heart was extremely uneasy. I was also worried that I would be chased down and killed by the authorities. The burden of it all made me absolutely miserable.
For a long time, the scene in the van that day played over and over in my mind—how a living being just like us had his organs ripped out while he was still alive, and the frightful pain and fear in his eyes as he looked up at me. My heart couldn’t bear it. I felt like I was going crazy, and constantly felt on the verge of collapse.
Many years have passed since then, but that horrible memory still cannot be erased. All those years, I didn’t want to touch it and purposefully avoided it. Because whenever I mentioned it, I could not hold myself together. Dr. Zheng

I’ve been wanting to share this story for a few days.

After a horrific car crash, Chase White’s parents were told by a different hospital their 22-year-old son was brain dead, and there were no options.

Thankfully, the story did not end there.

“It’s just been miracle after miracle,” said Jason White, Chase’s father, who spoke exclusively to Atlanta News First.

Almost three weeks ago, Jason received the call that his son Chase was in an accident in Hilton Head.

He had collided with a crane truck while on his way to work at a local restaurant and was rushed to a hospital in Savannah.

“I don’t know how to describe it,” Jason said. “It’s just numbing.”

Chase suffered a traumatic brain injury, collapsed lung, a broken jaw, and a broken arm.

They said he was not going to make it,” Jason said doctors told them. “We were told that we needed to make a big decision,” he continued. “Basically, pull the plug on him and let him go. His mom and I just weren’t ready to do that.” Faced with a heartbreaking choice, one doctor tried a surprising final test.

“He said put up two fingers, and sure as not. He put up two fingers, Chase did,” Jason said. “His Mom and I were sold that he wasn’t totally brain-dead. That he was still there.”

While they know the road is long, they now have something they were initially told was not possible: hope.

“He’s definitely in there, and he’s definitely alive, and he’s fighting very hard.”

Chase will need to have extensive rehabilitation.

The family has started a GoFundMe to help with those expenses.

If you would like to donate, click here.

READ more from the Atlanta News.

Patrick Henry Speech

I have made this simpler to read as this is how I typically study bible passages. I break them down to really understand each phrase and word.

Mr. President, No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house.

But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining, as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, 

I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the house is one of awful moment to this country. 

For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate

It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. 

Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope

We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. 

Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? 

Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? 

For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. 

I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past

And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen ‘have been pleased to solace themselves and the house? 

Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir. It will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss

Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let. us not deceive ourselves. sir.

These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. 

  • I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? 
  • Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? 
  • Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? 
  • No, sir, she has none. 
  • They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. 
  • They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. 
  • And what have we to oppose to them? 
  • Shall we try argument? 
  • Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. 
  • Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? 
  • Nothing. 
  • We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has all been in vain. 
  • Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? 
  • What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? 
  • Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer. 
  • Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. 
  • We have petitioned; 
  • we have remonstrated; 
  • we have supplicated; 
  • we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, 
  • and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. 

Our petitions have been slighted; 

our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; 

our supplications have been disregarded; 

and we have been spurned with contempt, 

from the foot of the throne! 

In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. 

There is no longer any room for hope. 

If we wish to be free; if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending; if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon, until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight ! 

I repeat it, sir, we must fight! 

An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak ; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. 

But when shall we be stronger? 

Will it be the next week or the next year? 

Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? 

Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? 

Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? 

Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. 

Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. 

Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. 

There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. 

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; 

it is to the vigilant,

the active, 

the brave. 

Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. 

There is no retreat, but in submission and slavery! 

Our chains are forged! 

Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! 

The war is inevitable—and let it come! 

I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, peace—but there is no peace. 

The war is actually begun! 

The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! 

Our brethren are already in the field! 

Why stand we here idle? 

What is it that gentlemen wish? 

What would they have? 

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? 

Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death !

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Take Action

Don’t let the day go by without talking to your children (God knows they don’t learn it in the Government schools.

Say a prayer for America today.

Rekindle hope today.

Honor the past by determining the future.

Watch, she says it all an much easier than me.

Refer back to my latest post

Medical and legal elites want the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) to change the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) to make “brain death” easier to declare, explicitly WITHOUT consent, including for the apnea test which removes the life-supporting ventilator and only risks harm.

Conscience opt-outs have been discussed but ONLY IF objection is made “prior” to initiation of the “brain death” exam protocol. Physician and healthcare provider opt-outs were not included. Conscience rights must include both patients and providers.

Dr. Byrne, Dr. Christine Zainer, and others are working to gather 10,000 letters to send to the Chicago-based Uniform Law Commission (ULC) to prevent making “brain death” easier to declare without explicit consent

Paul Byrne

Dr. Paul A. Byrne is a Board Certified Neonatologist and Pediatrician. He is the Founder of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center in St. Louis, MO. He is Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at University of Toledo, College of Medicine. He is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Fellowship of Catholic Scholars.

Dr. Byrne is past-President of the Catholic Medical Association (USA), formerly Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at St. Louis University in St. Louis, MO and Creighton University in Omaha, NE. He was Professor of Pediatrics and Chairman of the Pediatric Department at Oral Roberts University School of Medicine and Chairman of the Ethics Committee of the City of Faith Medical and Research Center in Tulsa, OK. He is author and producer of the film “Continuum of Life” and author of the books “Life, Life Support and Death,” “Beyond Brain Death,” and “Is ‘Brain Death’ True Death?”

Dr. Byrne has presented testimony on “life issues” to nine state legislatures beginning in 1967.

The Letter

Help Dr. Paul A. Byrne and Dr. Christine Zainer

Attached is the letter to be printed our and signed if you agree that the new guidelines being proposed need to be stopped. Send it to:

f you agree with the attached action letter prepared by Drs. Paul Byrne and Christine Zainer, please sign and return, if possible, before July 9, 2023, to

Christine Zainer (NOT directly to the ULC):

Christine Zainer, P.O. Box 26635, Milwaukee, Wi 53226

They will make copies and send the letters in a bundle to the ULC.

Please download the ULC action letter (PDF) here, and please forward it to others.

Articles on Brain Death that I have written for 13 years now.

As you know the Apnea Test has been a big concern of mine since the beginning of Jamie’s declaration of “brain death”. It is addressed in the letter above:

The apnea test is part of BD testing. During the apnea test procedure, the life-supporting ventilator is disconnected for up to 10 minutes. There are no benefits to the patient, only risks of harm.

1. The statute ought to protect the person from being declared dead when still alive. Full and complete information about the apnea test and any tests used to declare BD must be provided with freedom, at any time, by patients, surrogates, physicians, and other health care providers, to decline or cease the apnea test, exams, and protocols, for the determination and declaration of BD.

2. Treatment options ought to be made available that protect and preserve the life of the patient, even if disability is a potential outcome. Treatments should NOT be denied based on “quality-of-life” judgments by caregivers even though a patient or surrogate may legitimately refuse them.
3. Model statute below, in the negative, sets minimum criteria before death is declared. This minimum fulfills a change in state of the three vital systems to protect living patients from being treated as dead.

Thank you dear readers!