On October 29, 2013, I wrote about an execution in a New York Hospital. Michael (not his name by baptism), suddenly collapsed. His family called 911. The emergency medical team resuscitated Michael. On the way to the hospital, a pulse was detected. Medications to support blood pressure were used during the resuscitation. On admission to hospital, Michael was breathing, but unresponsive, His temperature was normal, but the next morning was elevated to 103 degrees (occurs with infection).

In less than 24 hours after admission to hospital, the neurology consultant wrote, “The patient is unresponsive. Pupils are fixed. Absent corneal reflex bilaterally. Absent doll’s eyes. No purposeful movements of the extremities noted. No movements of extremities to noxious stimuli. Reflexes are absent throughout. Toes are mute. IMPRESSION:… clinically, the patient is brain-dead status post cardiac arrest, likely with severe anoxic damage to the brain. May consider, do not resuscitate.”

EEG showed electrical activity. Two days after admission he was determined to be “brain dead” per neurology. During an apnea test, no breathing was observed.

It didn’t matter that there was brain wave activity and that his heart was beating 100,000 times per day and that circulation and respiration were occurring with support from the ventilator.

Michael’s relatives were assured that the determination of “brain death” was done in accordance with the hospital policy of certification of death by neurological criteria, which is patterned after, and consistent with, the New York State Department of Health and New York State Task Force on Life & the Law “Guidelines for Determining Brain Death,” published November 2011. In this document “brain death” is defined as “irreversible loss of all function of the brain, including the brain stem. The three essential findings are coma, absence of brainstem reflexes and apnea.” It was determined by a neurologist, an intensivist, and a hospitalist that there were no “confounding clinical circumstances.” Under New York State law, Michael was determined to be “brain-dead” and was legally dead.

A Catholic priest, chairman of the Ethics Committee at the hospital, volunteered that the hospital operated in accordance with the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services of the United States Catholic Conferences of Bishops. This man was legally “brain dead” and ventilator support of the vital activity of respiration would be stopped at a precise hour and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), which was already in place over the objection of the relatives, would be carried out. The ventilator was then taken away at the precise hour, even though Michael’s relatives strongly objected. Prior to removal of the ventilator, Michael’s heart was beating; blood pressure was normal. Michael had respiration supported by a ventilator that pushed air in. Michael had to exhale the air out before the ventilator could push the air in again. A ventilator can push air into a cadaver, also known as a corpse, but quickly after death, the air will not and cannot come out of a cadaver.

True death was imposed on Michael. The Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) includes “irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brainstem.” Note that the word “functions” is plural. The Guidelines in New York, however, include “total and irreversible loss of all brain function, including the brainstem.” Thus, in New York the singular “function” is stated, instead of the plural “functions.” The brain has many functions, but what is the single function that is all brain function in New York? There is no single function of the entire brain. (Emphasis mine.)

The NY rules and regulations call for providing “reasonable accommodation of a surrogate decision-maker’s religious or moral objections to use of the brain death standard to determine death.” Michael’s mother and sisters pleaded with the administrator of the hospital not to take away the ventilator, but the judgment had been made; nothing could be done to stop the removal of the ventilator. It was the hospital’s decision that they had provided “reasonable accommodation” to Michael’s family’s religious and moral objections to the “brain death” criteria used by the hospital. They had a Catholic priest, the Ethics Committee, and it was stated that they were operating in accordance with the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services of the United States Catholic Conferences of Bishops. It was also stated that they had a judge who agreed with what they were doing and they would give no more time to Michael, not even one more hour or one more day!

His Sister

Now, to recent events: Sharon, after the experience with her brother, Michael, in her own handwriting wrote this advanced directive: “I am a Pro-Life Traditional Catholic, I opt out of any organ or tissue donation, I believe in life support; request Catholic Priests for Absolution and Sacraments. If permanently incompetent/disabled, Christian home services or Catholic religious sister nursing home. I want the rosary, brown scapular, miraculous medal with me. I do not believe in euthanasia; in the event of my death my proxies can claim my body for Christian burial. (Signature) Sharon, September 3, 2019.”

One year later, on September 17, 2020, Sharon was praying the Rosary on the telephone with her friend, who noticed slurring of Sharon’s speech. Sharon collapsed; 911 was called. Sharon had a brain hemorrhage, commonly known as a stroke.

Soon after admission to hospital she was said to be “brain dead.” Sharon was in coma. EEG twice had electrical activity. Scans of her head showed circulation to part of her brain twice. Her First and Second Powers of Attorney directed that the procedure of the apnea test was not to be done. Nevertheless, it was done anyway. During this procedure the life-supporting ventilator was stopped for 7 minutes. Carbon dioxide increased to 56 (normal is 40); breathing was not observed. There was absence of brainstem reflexes including pupillary and corneal reflexes, no cough, no gag, no eye movement when ice water was put into her ear canal. Sharon was declared “brain dead” by neurological criteria on September 21, 2020.

Sharon designated a First Heath Care Proxy and Second Heath Care Proxy. Both expressed strongly, multiple times that Sharon believed in life support and directed that life support be continued. They petitioned the NY Supreme Court for help. The case was dismissed; the Court noted: “The first is that in her handwritten notes…she was very clear in the breadth and depth of her religious faith, and she very clearly said…I believe in life support. What she didn’t say is that I want life support” . . . [Emphasis mine]The Court continued: “I was more taken by the printed words…I wish to follow the moral teachings of the Catholic church and to receive all the obligatory care my religion teaches we have a duty to accept. However, I also know that death need not be resisted by every means and that I have the right to refuse medical treatment that is excessively burdensome or would only prolong my death and delay my being taken to God. Those are powerful words coming from – although they’re preprinted for her, they’re powerful words coming from a devout Catholic who says that she believes in life support, but, at the same time, she accepts the principles and teachings of her church with regard to the limitations on what is required for her to be mindful of and in compliance with the teachings that she holds so dear. As a result of that, I found it was – I wasn’t able to reach a specific conclusion as to what her intentions were.”

With that, the Court dismissed the petition from the Heath Care Proxies. Then, a petition was made to Federal Court, but there also the petition was dismissed.

After the experience with her brother Sharon in her own handwriting wrote that she believed in life support. She wrote on a preprinted form obtained from the Diocese of Syracuse, with reference to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services of the United States Catholic Conferences of Bishops and A Catholic Guide to End of Life Decisions, the National Catholic Bioethics Center..

The Health Care Proxies were following the handwritten directions of Sharon who believed in life support. The preprinted words of her directions included, “When patients act with a free and informed consent, they may use advanced medical techniques that are experimental and involve risk—but they are never obligated to do so. Whether to accept such treatments rests entirely within the discretion of the patient or his/her medical proxy.”

The Court chose to use one part of the preprinted pages, but not this part, and the Court stated that Sharon wrote “I believe in life support,” not I want life support. (Emphasis mine.)

First, Sharon’s brother had death imposed, then Sharon wrote in her own words that she believed in life support and designated Health Care Proxies to speak for her. Sharon did what she could; the health Care Proxies did what they could, but the medical and legal systems decided that Sharon was “brain dead” on September 21, 2020 when she was 63 years of age. Sharon’s 64th birthday was October 10, 2020 while she was in the hospital. Then, on November 10, 2020 the life-supporting ventilator was taken away by the doctors after petition by the healthcare proxy to continue life-support was dismissed by the Court.

Sharon became truly dead as manifest by change in color to pale and blue, no exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the tissues, no heartbeat, and no circulation and all vital functions, consequent thereon. Sharon no longer was alive. Her life had ended. The nurse called the proxy to tell her that Sharon had passed at 7:00 pm on November 10, 2020.

What is all this? Sharon witnessed death imposed on her brother as life support was taken away from him. She wrote that she wanted life support. She designated Health Care Proxies to speak for her. But what happened? Life support and Sharon’s life were taken away. The medical and legal systems did not protect the life of Sharon or her brother. How and why?

Prior to 1968 ventilators were in use but there was no controversy. Some patients improved on a ventilator and some died on a ventilator. The goal of medical practice was obvious – to preserve and protect the life and health of the patient and not to declare that a living person is dead when he/she is still alive.

“Brain death” did not originate or develop by way of application of the scientific method. “Brain death” began with the appointment of the Harvard Committee to consider the issues. The results of their work were published in the 1968 “Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death.” [1] The first words of this report are as follows: “Our primary purpose is to define irreversible coma as a new criterion for death.” The primary purpose of the Committee was not to determine IF irreversible coma was an appropriate criterion for death but to see to it that IT WAS established as a “new criterion for death.” With an agenda like that at the outset, the data could be made to fit the already arrived at conclusions. There was a serious lack of scientific method in the origination and development of “brain death.”

Only persons who are alive can be in a coma, whether reversible or not. Was this the hubris of a few academicians or was it simply a surrender to fear of legal chastisement regarding perceived economic and utilitarian needs in 1968, especially the desire to get healthy living vital organs for transplantation? It seems that a predetermined agenda existed from the onset. There were no patient data and no references to basic scientific studies. In fact, there was only one reference, which was to Pope Pius XII. [2] While there was a reference to and a quotation from this Allocution of Pope Pius XII, they neglected to include the following: “But considerations of a general nature allow us to believe that human life continues for as long as its vital functions – distinguished from the simple life of organs – manifest themselves spontaneously or even with the help of artificial processes.”

“Brain death” is not true death. Rather it is observing cessation of functioning of the brain, which is then translated into “brain death.” The primary reason for the origination and propagation of “brain death” was and is the desire to obtain vital organs for transplantation and to stop ventilators and life-supporting treatments and care. A validly applied scientific method, sound reasoning, and available medical technology were not utilized in developing the new way of determination of death called “brain death.” Death is the absence of life. Life and true death cannot and do not exist at the same time in the same person.

When a person has a head injury or, as in Sharon’s case, sudden collapse due to a stroke, the possibility of getting organs for transplantation is entertained. Sharon had opted out of any organ or tissue donation.

First, Michael collapsed and his sister, Sharon, and their mother fought for him to have treatment including the ventilator continued. They lost. The medical and legal system effectively executed Michael and, more recently, his sister.

Second, Sharon, aware of what happened to her brother, Michael, wrote a life-supporting directive, and designated health care proxies. It made no difference as her life-support was cut off and she, too, was effectively executed – both in the same hospital.

The medical and legal systems in this NY hospital did not protect the life of this brother and sister. The issues are not limited to this hospital or the state of NY.

The medical and legal systems have been implemented to get vital unimpaired organs and to turn off ventilators from patients labeled as “brain dead” but who are still alive.

This article was written by Dr. Paul Byrne. Posted first on Renew America.

See: www.lifeguardianfoundation.org for information on how to protect and preserve your life.


[1] Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. Special Communication. JAMA 1968;205(6):85-88.

[2] Pius XII. To an International Congress of Anesthesiologists, Nov. 24, 1957, The Pope Speaks, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Spring 1958), 393–398.© Paul A. Byrne, M.D.

Have we lost our God-given humanity?

I sit here trying my best to write as tears flow from my eyes. I was traveling the month of April and was doing my best to take a mental break from everything going on in the world. So I missed ALL of this but now that I have found it here goes.

We have known for a while that abortion groups harvested baby parts. Thanks to David Delian of the Center for Medical Progress and all the undercover videos he provided to the public.

However, this new report has sparked outrage at the revelation that the US government is the entity responsible for the trafficking of the aborted babies.

Recent emails uncovered by Judicial Watch between FDA employees and the California-based Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) prove the agency spent tens of thousands of dollars buying aborted babies for unethical scientific experiments between 2012 and 2018.

In 2018, the Trump administration terminated the contract, halting government fetal tissue research due to concerns the contracts were unlawful.

Judicial Watch’s new FOIA Request adds 575 pages of records and correspondence between the FDA and ABR.

(Read the entire Federalist article here) I have linked to both the results of Judicial Watch 575 pages and the Federalist article. However the majority of the 575 pages are tests results on the babies. It is upsetting to see LIVING on the tissues and I am not sure what that means.

The National Institutes of Health in April said the Biden Administration removed restrictions that the Trump administration imposed on research using fetal tissue, allowing university researchers and government scientists freer rein to use material from elective abortions when studying diseases and possible treatments. NIH also told its internal scientific and clinical directors that it was lifting a Trump-era ban on using federal money to buy human fetal tissue for biomedical studies by government employees.

For scientific studies undertaken by government employees, a one-paragraph email from Michael M. Gottesman, NIH’s deputy director for internal research said guidelines “will return to their previous state.”

Human fetal tissue, the email said, “may again be used” in NIH’s laboratories.

Are you Ok with this?

  • The FDA agreed to pre-pay Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR), likely the country’s largest fetal tissue trafficking firm, an estimated $2,000 for each aborted child, adding up to $12,000 per average box of tissue with shipping and packaging fees.
  • The FDA bought organs like livers, brains, and eyeballs of dismembered babies for hundreds of dollars apiece, courtesy of ABR’s collusion with local Planned Parenthoods.
  • A 21-week old baby with Down Syndrome whose child’s limbs, organs, and skin were sold at hundreds of dollars apiece.
  • The FDA demanded that tissue be in pristine condition. Fresh never frozen from babies 16-24 weeks old.

I am not OK with this. I’d rather have a “mean tweet” any day of the week.

I can understand why the Federal Government wanted to keep these emails private, they are allowing the trafficking of human baby parts with (cough cough) your tax dollars. Very few people understood abortion was the killing of a pre-born child in Roe V Wade in 1973…. as we didn’t have ultra-sound technology. But we do now and there is NO EXCUSE for this depravity.

One of my grandchildren

The Washington Post said that NIH was required to get “permission” to take the tissues for research. “It said researchers applying for federal grants or contracts involving work with fetal tissue still must obtain consent from the tissue’s donor, may not pay for such tissue and must follow all other federal, state or university requirements.”

Now IF you believe this I have a swamp to sell you in Florida.

Pray daily for our nation to return to God, it is the only way. Father, forgive our sins and turn us back to you.

***Please take a few minutes and read the Federalist article***

VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021.

Megan Redshaw's avatar

Megan Redshaw

Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received to the system as of Friday of the previous week.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the number of injuries and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccines revealed steadily rising numbers, but no new trends. VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received to the system as of Friday of the previous week. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 26, a total of 50,861 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 2,249 deaths — an increase of 199 over the previous seven days — and 7,726 serious injuries, up 631 over the same time period.

VAERS data released today showed 118,902 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021.

Of the 2,249 deaths reported as of March 26, 28% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 24 hours and 43% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 136.7 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of March 26.

From the 3-26-2021 release of VAERS data.

This week’s VAERS data show:

  • 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
  • 45% of those who died were male, 43% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
  • The average age of those who died was 77.7 and the youngest death was an 18-year-old.
  • As of March 26, 341 pregnant women had reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 104 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
  • Of the 578 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 63% of cases were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations — almost twice as many as reported (36%) following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine. Seven cases of Bell’s Palsy were reported with Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine (1%).
  • There were 2,578 reports of anaphylaxis, with 53% of cases attributed to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, 44% to Moderna and 3% to J&J vaccine, which was rolled out in the U.S. on March 2.
  • Using a broadened search for any reference to anaphylaxis in chart notes resulted in 15,193 reports, with 52% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, 45% to Moderna and 3% to J&J. With each vaccine, nearly 42% of anaphylactic reports occurred in people aged 17-44.

According to the CDC’s website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”Ask Congress to Investigate COVID Origins – Take Action

To date, the only information the CDC has published related to the investigation of COVID vaccine-related deaths and how those investigations were conducted is a COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Update via the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, published Jan. 27.

An interview in MedPage Today highlighted the shortfalls of the post-marketing surveillance of the COVID vaccine. Aaron Kesselheim, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said we are seeing a lot of spontaneous reporting, a lack of formal post-approval studies because vaccines have only received Emergency Use Authorization and vaccines being given outside the healthcare systems — interfering with the ability to rigorously collect observational data.

Although the CDC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have various systems in place to monitor the safety of vaccines, they are not “up and running” and do not have adequate resources behind them, Kesselheim said.

According to Kesselheim, there’s essentially nobody keeping track of COVID adverse reactions in the U.S. and no long-term safety data, but emphasized that this new mRNA technology is “extremely effective and extremely safe.”

On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We provided a written list of questions about how the CDC conducts investigations into reported deaths, the status of investigations on deaths reported in the media, if autopsies are being done and the standard for determining whether an injury is causally connected to a vaccine.

We also inquired about whether healthcare providers are reporting all injuries and deaths that might be connected to the COVID vaccine, and what education initiatives are in place to encourage and facilitate proper and accurate reporting.

It took the CDC 22 days to respond to our repeated inquiries. When someone did, the person told us the agency had never received the questions — even though the employees we talked to several times said their press officers were working through the list of questions and were reviewing the email we sent. We provided the questions again yesterday, and requested a response by April 7.

Breakthrough cases

On March 31, The Defender reported on the increasing number of “breakthrough cases” of COVID in fully vaccinated people. Washington, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, New York, California and Minnesota have all reported breakthrough cases of COVID, some of which have resulted in hospitalization and death. Investigations are underway to determine if there were problems with the vaccines or if people had been infected with a variant.

When asked about the increasing number of breakthrough cases during a White House press conference, Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical advisor, said it is something they will take seriously and follow closely, but breakthrough infections happen with any vaccination.

CDC issues new travel guidance, vaccine passports stir controversyThe CDC today issued new travel guidance stating that fully vaccinated Americans traveling within the U.S. do not have to get tested for COVID before or after their trip, and do not need to self-quarantine when they return home.

On March 29, The Defender reported that the Biden administration and private companies are working to develop vaccine passports that would require Americans to prove they’ve been vaccinated against COVID as the country opens.

Dr. Naomi Wolf, founder and CEO of Daily Clout, said the passport system really isn’t about the vaccine. It’s about your data, and “once this rolls out you don’t have a choice about being part of the system.”

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) said that vaccine credentials are a complete government overstep that will undermine public trust and substantially limit normal day-to-day essential activities. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said “vaccine passports are unconstitutional. Period.”

On March 26, New York launched a digital vaccine passport system known as Excelsior Pass that residents can use to prove they’ve been vaccinated or recently tested negative for infection. The New York system, built on IBM’s digital health pass platform, will be used at dozens of events, including arts and entertainment venues.

J&J  makes headlines with manufacturing mix-up, report of severe allergic reaction

As The Defender reported April 1, 15 million doses of J&J’s vaccine failed quality control after workers at a Baltimore manufacturing plant negligently put an AstraZeneca ingredient in J&J’s COVID vaccine. The mix-up forced regulators to delay authorization of the plant’s production lines and prompted an investigation by the FDA.

On March 31, Business Insider reported that a 74-year-old Virginia man suffered a rare reaction to J&J’s vaccine that caused a painful rash to spread across his entire body and skin to peel off. Richard Terrell told local news station WRIC he began suffering strange symptoms four days after receiving the vaccine.

“I began to feel a little discomfort in my armpit and then a few days later I began to get an itchy rash, and then after that I began to swell and my skin turned red,” Terrell said.

The rash spread to his entire body and his skin peeled off. He went to the emergency room, where doctors determined that he had experienced an adverse reaction to the COVID vaccine.

AstraZeneca suspended in Germany and Canada 

On March 31, The Defender reported that Germany indefinitely suspended use of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine for anyone under 60 following advice from STIKO, the country’s independent vaccine committee and external experts.

The committee investigated reports of blood clots, some fatal, in people who received the vaccine and decided to give the vaccine only to people 60 or older unless they belong to a high-risk category where the benefits outweigh the risk of a serious side-effect.

As The Defender reported on March 30, several regions of Germany, including Berlin and Munich, had temporarily paused the vaccine for people under 60 after Germany’s vaccine regulator disclosed 31 cases of a rare brain blood clot, nine of which resulted in deaths. The decision was made as a precaution ahead of a meeting with national medical regulators scheduled for later in the day where it was decided to indefinitely suspend the vaccine.

On March 30, Canada announced it was suspending AstraZeneca’s vaccine for people under age 55 following concerns it might be linked to rare blood clots, The Defender reported.

Health Canada demanded AstraZeneca conduct a detailed study on the risks and benefits of its COVID vaccine across multiple age groups, and suspended the vaccine for younger groups pending the outcome of that review.

On March 24, Health Canada updated the product information for AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccines to warn of the risk of rare blood clots associated with low levels of blood platelets following vaccinations — a stark reversal from Canada’s former position.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

“© April 2,2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

18-year-old Lewis Roberts, from Leek, Staffordshire, was declared brain dead after being hit by a van. But he blinked and started breathing on his own hours before his organs were due to be donated.

He suffered catastrophic head injuries after being struck by a vehicle in his hometown on March 13. Four days later the family was asked to say their good-byes. His sister,

His sister Jade Roberts, 28, explains how it all transpired in a very emotional post.

She says she went in with some other family members to say their goodbyes, held Lewis’ hands and urged him to breathe. They had been for a brown line to show on the machine many days. It would mean he was breathing himself but there was nothing.

“Midnight When I said 1 2 3 breath Lewis a brown line showed. The middle line of the video shows the brown line which is Lewis taking a breath for himself. When I said breath the brown line showed and he took a breath, we were told no it must be an error, it is impossible,” she says in the post.

But as soon as she reached home she got a phone call saying Lewis was really breathing on his own. “His eyes are dilating which before we had nothing. Zero… And to be told he was brain dead and suffered brain stem death and was literally certified as dead..” she says in the post.

 ‘After taking out numerous tests the hospital told us Lewis had given up the fight, no response and had suffered brain stem death.

‘We signed forms you wouldn’t even believe and conversations you’d never believe.. we were intended to say our final goodbyes.

‘Lewis was officially certified as dead last week And his death was even reported to the coroner.

Video of his sister encouraging him to breath is here.

Read other successful stories of people waking up.

Families don’t give up. Give your loved one time for the brain to heal.


What the heck is going on? Everyday I ask myself how is this happening in America. There has been absolute chaos since 2015 when Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President of the United States.  I naively thought the chaos would end after the election.  

I have been active in politics since my late 20’s and I have never experienced anything like the turmoil of the last four years. Who in the heck has been running our country for the last 50 years that has allowed so many Marxist to infiltrate our country and tear down our values? 

So many times I have wanted to throw my hands in the air and shrink back to my little corner of the world. And yet the revelations that have been exposed over the last four years forces me to stay and fight for our Constitution and Republic. 

They say once you SEE, you can never unsee and this is where I am. I know too much to keep quiet. 

I decided to write this because not a week goes by that someone doesn’t call me up and ask me, “Missy, are you sure Trump is going to win?”  (Ha you know who you are)

Honestly I do believe that he will win because God has raised him up to be the Cyrus for our generation and I have not once doubted. 

Buckle up it is going to get worse

This is going to be long blog post especially if you take the time to read the articles and video’s I have linked too. However, it is important and I want you get the full picture of what is happening NOW and what is going to happen UP TO and AFTER the election. 

A few weeks ago I found out about a group called, Transition Integrity Project. 

Sounds good right?  

Peaceful transitions of power have always been the hallmark of our Republic, UNTIL Trump was elected. Historically regardless of how bad the election season was, we as Americans were always able to lay the election results aside, rise above the rancor and support the new duly elected President. 

When Obama was elected I congratulated him on my Facebook page and on my ActiveRain blog. No I didn’t agree with his policies but I supported him as my President. However the 2016 Election of Donald J Trump as President has NEVER been accepted by the majority of the Democrat’s and consequently we have spent the last four years in utter chaos.

The members of the Transition Integrity Project reportedly consist of current and former senior government and campaign leaders, academics, journalists, polling experts and former federal and state government officials who fear that if Trump loses the 2020 election he will not leave. 

Who is on this “bipartisan” committee that is suppose to be insuring election integrity? 

Some of the more familiar members’ names include: 

John Podesta, former White House Chief of Staff to former President Bill Clinton,  Donna Brazile, former Democratic National Committee Acting Chair and debate question cheater for Hillary Clinton. Never Trumper William Kristol and David Frum, a Canadian-American and former speech writer for former President George W. Bush. (Frum has been credited with inspiring the phrase “axis of evil” in Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address.) 

In order to understand this Transition Integrity Project read their goals and what they plan to do. NOT from the media interpretation but from their own brochure and instructions

Don’t for one minute think the Transition Integrity Project is the only one involved and pushing the coming play book to challenge the election.

Listen to Mark Zuckerberg speak about how he too is prepping people for election night.

What we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the american people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or even weeks to make sure all the votes are counted,” Zuckerberg said this during an appearance on “Axios on HBO.”

Watch and listen to his remarks here. (Only 1 minute long) Yes, big tech will be promoting that the election will not be determined on November 3rd but can go on for weeks or months afterwards. 

Do you remember when we found out that The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York? 

Read about it here for background.  The long and short of it was this was a planned meeting between the above to prepare for a coming pandemic. They met in October 2019, four months prior to the current pandemic…called CV19. 

Transition Integrity Project also had a planned exercise to prepare for what could happen on election night. Read about it here. 

Here are the exercises they role played just last month in August. 

  1. An Unclear Winner.
  2. Clear Biden Win with Biden winning outright in the Electoral College and the popular vote.
  3. Clear Trump Win in electoral college however, with 47% of the popular vote for former Vice President Biden.
  4. Narrow Biden Win where he leads with less than 1% of the popular vote the day after the election, and is predicted to win 278 electoral votes.

In all their role play exercises notice NOT one scenario where Trump wins and Biden concedes.

Michigan Recent Rules 

Friday in Michigan a judge ruled that we could have two weeks to count and certify the votes. Former Michigan law requires them to be received by the time polls close on Election Day.

Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens said there’s a crucial need for flexibility in November, especially after more than 6,400 ballots were disqualified in the state’s August primary election.  

In a totally separate case in Michigan a federal judge on Thursday blocked Michigan’s longstanding ban on transporting voters to the polls.  Since 1895 it has been a misdemeanor in Michigan to hire drivers to take voters to polling places unless they’re unable to walk. 

Now I need you to go and watch one of my favorite researchers on the coup in the making.  She is known as Amazing Polly on YouTube. 

As one of my friends told me early on, there was a covert operation to get rid of Trump when they came up with the Fake Russia, Russia narrative,  the Fake Steele Dossier and the Fake Impeachment, but it is now a covert operation. Remember the day after the Inauguration the Washington Post wrote and article on Impeaching Trump. 

The main difference between overt and covert is that overt means openly, whereas covert means hidden or not shown openly. 

Did you ever imagine you would be living in such a time as this? 

The Color Revolution 

What is a color revolution is and why is it important to understand. 

A Color Revolution is the term used to describe a series of remarkably effective CIA-led regime change operations using techniques developed by the RAND Corporation, “National Endowment for Democracy” NGOs (Non Government Organizations) and other groups since the 1980’s.

The is the current play book they are using to enact the coup and destroy our culture. Get familiar with the term and what it means. It has been used for many years by the CIA to overturn duly elected people all over the world. 

A color revolution was used to bring down the Polish communist regime in the late 1980s. Over the years the techniques were refined and used, along with heavy bribes, to topple the Gorbachev regime in the Soviet Union.

The model was refined and deployed in 2004 as the Ukraine Orange Revolution with logo and color theme scarves, and in 2003 in Georgia as the Rose Revolution. Later Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used the template to launch the Arab Spring. In all cases the CIA was involved with other NGOs including the Soros Foundations. 

If interested you can Duck Duck Go and read more about color revolutions and why we have been in the midst of one since all the riots of Antifa and Black Lives Matter began.

Read more.

John Craig Roberts, bio linked and author said: 

“Under the pretext that President Trump will not step down if he loses reelection, Democrats and the military/security complex created the Transition Integrity Project.  The plan they have worked out is to take the presidency regardless of the vote.  Trump’s win is to be blamed on vote fraud, and Biden/Kamala are forbidden to concede their defeat.  Instead, the presstitutes will conduct a propaganda campaign against Trump alleging election fraud in order to cast Trump’s reelection in doubt.

The propaganda campaign against Trump will be conducted by assertions and fake news just as was the Russiagate, Impeachgate, and other orchestrated false charges against Trump.  The Democrats know that just like their other false allegations against Trump, the media will back them to the hilt and many dumbshit Americans will believe the lies. The presstitutes have done nothing for four years but try to discredit President Trump in the eyes of both Americans and the world.”

In case you didn’t know (because I didn’t) a Presstitute is a term that references journalists and ‘pundits’ in mainstream media who give biased and predetermined views misleadingly tailored to fit a particular partisan, financial or business agenda, thus neglecting the fundamental duty to report news impartially.

Here is a good segment on Tucker Carlson with Darren Beattie describing the coup and using the model of the Color Revolution being set up to over- throw our government. 

The God of All Hope

Now that I have totally freaked you out, depressed and worried you, let me finish by saying this to all my friends reading. God is Sovereign! Let me say it again….

GOD is Sovereign 

I have been saying for months the exact same thing that Franklin Graham recently said; 

“The only hope for this country is God, Donald Trump can’t turn it around. Joe Biden isn’t going to turn it around. Only God can do this. And we need God’s help.”

Alex McFarland, a Christian Apologist and author of the book The Assault on America: How To Defend It Before It is too Late states:

“I’m absolutely concerned that we’re watching a coup attempt in process,” McFarland stated.  “I honestly believe that we are in a state of war.   And there are people who want the U.S. Constitution to fall, all our civil liberties given by God to be gone.  And so I will say this: that I believe we are in the most tenuous position our country has ever faced since the American Revolution.” 

The war we are in now is not with guns (although I just bought my first shotgun) it is a digital information war. 

This phrase digital soldiers was coined by General Michael Flynn while speaking at the Young America’s Foundation where he called all of us Digital Soldiers

Recently General Flynn wrote an OP-Ed in the Western Journal, where he said:

“We are witnessing a vicious assault by enemies of all that is good, and our president is having to act in ways unprecedented in decades, maybe centuries.

The biblical nature of good versus evil cannot be discounted as we examine what is happening on the streets of America. When the destiny of the United States is at stake, and it is, the very future of the entire world is threatened.

As Christians, shouldn’t we act? 

In Conclusion

The church, the true Body of Christ must wake up. We have been called to be salt and light. Do you think we are fulfilling that calling ? 

I believe there is a remnant that is being salt and light but many believers are in the dark and many/most? have lost their flavor. They are not doing their part to preserve our culture.  They have no idea what is going on in our nation.

They don’t understand spiritual warfare, pastors don’t teach on it so how could they? 

We need a move of God in this Nation to turn peoples hearts back to God. To revive and restore our hearts and the principals of liberty and justice for ALL. I am sick of this two-tiered justice system where the elite at the top FBI, DOJ and those with power and money are getting off scott free. 

The gates of hell are knocking on the door of our Great American Experiment. If you have no idea what I am talking about, ask God to open your eyes. 

Christians seem to be unaware of the fact that any attack against our Liberty is an attack against God who gave us Liberty. 

Pray for people on the front lines, Riots to Revivals. People are being saved, anons are coming to Christ and we are in the midst of a Biblical Great Awakening.

I have outlined the enemies plan so now you know how to pray. God is God and He is changing hearts and minds everyday. Our nation will rise up once again to the Glory of God.

The best is yet to come! #WWG1WGA

Further Reading 

Ronald Reagan Video, We must fight 

Important Video for 2020 Election This pretty much explains the ENTIRE point of my blog post. 

Letter to America from NoorBinLaden, sound familiar. Read and Be Blessed.

Blogs I read everyday that are not OWNED by the 6 parent companies that control ALL of the media, print and cable. And you thought there was at least one that was “fair and balanced?”

Gateway Pundit

The Federalist

The Conservative Treehouse

For a conglomeration of aggregated conservative news use WhatAFinger